Download PDF Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat
As we say, the book that we offer in the link to download is the soft file types. So, it will certainly let you go out to seek for book. As well as now, to upgrade our collection, Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy Of Defeat as the current book coming is provided. This is among the best seller books that originate from an expert author. Besides, the author has increase the bundle of guide to be much intriguing. It doesn't should think a growing number of to obtain every significance form this publication.
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat
Download PDF Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat
Come join us to find the amazing analysis book from around the world! When you really feel so hard to locate many books from various other countries, it will certainly not be here. In this web site, we have billion titles of guides from this nation as well as abroad. And one to bear in mind, you will never lack this book, as in the book store. Why? We provide the soft documents of those publications to get quickly by all visitors.
This book is one recommended book that can heal and deal with the time you have. Spare time is the best time to read a book. When there are no friends to talk with, this is better to utilize that time for reading. If you are being in the long waiting lists, this is also the perfect time to read or even being on an enjoyable trip. Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy Of Defeat can be a good friend; of course this simple book will perform as good as you think about.
The Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy Of Defeat as one of the advised products has been written in order to urge the people life. It is genuine reality about just what to do as well as what occurred. When someone asks about something, you could not be so hard after obtaining several impacts and also lessons from reading publications. Among them is this book. The book is recommended one to be functional publication sources.
Beginning to read this publication could start your chance in doing this life better. It will make you count on have even more times or more leisures in reading. Alloting few times in a day just for reading can be done as one of the efforts for you to finish your activities. When you will finish the evening before sleeping, Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy Of Defeat is additionally a good idea to accompany you.
Review
"One of the more interesting and better books on military aviation to appear in the last few years."―Journal of Military History , reviewing a previous edition or volume"The book contains many interesting insights and interpretations. Why Air Forces Fail is an excellent introduction to the study of military failure in general and air forces in particular."―Journal of America's Military Past , reviewing a previous edition or volume
Read more
About the Author
Robin Higham (1925–2015), was emeritus professor of military history at Kansas State University. He authored and edited many works about aviation history, including The Influence of Airpower upon History: Statesmanship, Diplomacy, and Foreign Policy since 1903.Stephen J. Harris is the chief historian for the Directorate of History and Heritage at the National Defence Headquarters in Ottawa, Canada. He coauthored The Crucible of War: The Official History of the Royal Canadian Air Force.
Read more
Product details
Paperback: 450 pages
Publisher: University Press of Kentucky; revised and expanded edition edition (June 22, 2016)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0813167515
ISBN-13: 978-0813167510
Product Dimensions:
6 x 1.5 x 9 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.2 out of 5 stars
11 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#1,048,868 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
If there's anything at all wrong with this work (and there isn't anything, really) it's the slightly uneven style and emphasis which is inherent in an ensemble book with chapters by different writers. Suggestions for further research at the end of each chapter - apparently characteristic of Higham's books - are particularly handy in this work. The price may seem a bit high for a Kindle edition, but the value is there for both amateurs and (if they take the lessons to heart) professionals.
Interesting look at air forces
In this book the author takes an interesting look on what an air force can do wrong and why. He breaks down the failures into three classes: those that started off winning and then lost, those that started off losing and then won, and finally those that never had a chance.Examples:The German and Japanese Air Forces were very strong at the beginning of the war but wound up losing. They simply didn't have the resource (i.e. gasoline, pilots, etc.)The American Air Force started out with too few planes, poor intelligence, leadership, etc. But by the end of the war.The last category would include the French and the Polish which started off poor and didn't improve.
These types of books are only as good as their editors make them, and unfortunately these editors didn't do a great job. With these types of books it is necessary for the editors to really give the work structure, organization and guidance and all three were lacking in this book. Because of this the contributions are isolated and do not work towards a common goal.German, French and Great Britain's performance in WWII was covered by three separate chapters, and each contributor's essay dealt with its subject in isolation from the other contributions which gives the reader three disjointed conclusions for failure and success of each. The problem is that all three are interconnected. One cannot really discuss French failure without discussing German success because, while France's failures were profound and debilitating, German success was a major factor as well. France had failed to conceptualize and then implement a strategy that would maximize their air power in WWII which was a major factor in the total failure of its air forces, but this might not have lead to the unmitigated disaster that followed had it not been for the German success at developing a successful strategy against France. The problem with this book is that it treats each subject in isolation, so that all the reader gets is France's own failures as the reason for its poor performance in WWII, and this is not an accurate or a whole picture.Also Great Britain's eventual success was a product of lessons learned from French failure and German miscalculation and arrogance (along with the Soviet's successful strategy of giving up land for time). Had GB not learned those lessons, and had Germany not decided on terror bombing and the disastrous Russian campaign (or had they simply focused production from the beginning on a long conflict) the story for GB might have been very different. Had the editors given their contributors a little guidance I think each could have contributed their own piece to create a whole picture, but instead they contributed pieces that created isolated pictures unto themselves leaving nothing but a disjointed work that feels anything but complete.Next, much of the material isn't really new or innovative. If you are someone who has studied WWII or WWI at any depth then much of this material will be rehash you have read before. The French suffered a weak government and an old military leadership stuck in the era of trench warfare which are two major factors (although certainly not the only factors) that doomed the French. This isn't new information. This is basic stuff. While there were tidbits of information that were a little more in depth and more focused on air power than one might normally get from other histories, these tidbits were not worth the amount of pages one had to read to get them.Lastly, the authors do not tackle some of the areas I was really hoping would be discussed. Like why air power has never been able to win a major conflict against a determined and motivated opponent. In WWII Germany had lost the air war and was being pounded daily by Allied bombing, but yet it wasn't until almost all of Germany was overrun that Nazi Germany fell. Why was Allied bombing a failure in that sense? Next the authors suggest that Japan was an instance were air power brought a war to a successful conclusion, but I think that point could be argued as well given the fact that when Tito learned of the scale of destruction from the two atomic bombs he was more than prepared to continue the fighting, and even suggested that the fire bombings were more destructive. These attacks certainly helped to drive home the hopeless situation facing the emperor which helped him end the war, but to say air power alone did this is a point that could certainly be argued.There is also the case of the "shock and awe" strategy employed by the US. This has failed numerous times against determined foes in Iraq were the US enjoyed total air superiority and control (also it failed for Israel in Lebanon as well, but I wont fault the authors for not being able to write about the future). This seems to me to be a glaring omission. Why do we find that even with total air superiority it still requires land forces to actually take physical control of territory? In the early days of flight it was thought to be the weapon that would end all wars. It would be so terrible and the destruction so great that nations would fall in days due to intense bombing. The terribleness of the destruction has come to pass, but why has air power failed to bring about a conclusion to any engagement on its own? Why has air power been a strategic failure on its own without support of land based forces? These are the kind of questions I hoped would be tackled, but yet I was wholly disappointed.This book would be great for someone just getting into air power and looking for a quick easy starter, but if you have been studying these conflicts and air power for any real length of time and in any real depth then I think you can skip this work.
An extremely readable and informative work, with essays ranging from the First World War to the Falklands conflict. The essays are quite reasonable in length, if anything sometimes too short, and include sections on areas which need more research and recommended reading. I ask you my fellow history lovers- is there anything more helpful to the student of history than a good annotated bibliography?
A fine study,comprehensive, of major strengths and weakness' and how to tell the difference
Nice Read
GOOD READ
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat PDF
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat EPub
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat Doc
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat iBooks
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat rtf
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat Mobipocket
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar